The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence (3 million won in penalty) declared by the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal is deemed to be too unhutiled and unfair.

2. The court below determined the above punishment against the defendant on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. The defendant caused the traffic accident of this case by the negligence of driving the central line with the central line, resulting in the victim's severe injury, such as the 12-day pressure frame, which requires medical treatment for 12 weeks, and the crime quality is not less and less in light of the substance and degree of injury, etc., the prosecutor's assertion of sentencing disadvantageous to the trial at the court below seems to have been sufficiently taken into account when determining the punishment at the court below. In light of the above, the defendant who has no record of criminal punishment at all shows the attitude that the crime of this case was committed in a timely fashion, and the defendant who did not have any record of criminal punishment at the court below did not agree with the victim in the course of investigation, as well as that the victim submitted a written application that the victim would have the seat of the defendant again at the court below, the judgment of the court below is too unfford and it exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

shall not be appointed by a person.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.