logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.07.05 2018고단1347
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that A, the Defendant’s used, loaded at around 05:31 on February 6, 2006, more than 46.84 tons and more than 46.84 tons in front of the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s business office, and violated the restriction on vehicle operation by operating a vehicle at the level of 12.23 tons and 12.35 times out of the 5 cattle, with a gross weight of more than 10 tons in excess of 10 tons.

2. The former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005 and wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008) which is a legal provision applicable to the facts charged of this case and Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008), which is a legal provision applicable to the facts charged of this case, where an agent, employee, or other worker of the legal entity commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 with respect to the

Article 47(3) of the Constitutional Court Act provides that “The portion of the charge in this case shall be retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality [see Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga, 14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (Joint)] (see Constitutional Court Decision 14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (Joint)]. Thus, since the charge in this case is not a crime, the charge in this case shall be acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment of innocence shall be published pursuant to Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act,

arrow