The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On September 26, 2012, the Defendant committed assault against the victim E in the underground parking lot “D” located at the window C of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, against the assault of the victim E, and assaulted, such as “Yedoar gue, Madro Madro, Madro Madro,” and “Yeng-gu, Madro Madro Madro, Madro Madro,” which

2. We examine the judgment. This is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the “Agreement” attached to the trial record, the victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on June 26, 2013, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.