Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and fines for 40 million won, Defendant B's imprisonment for six months, and Defendant C for ten months, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a Grade V local educational administrative officer belonging to the I Office of Education, who is in office as the secretary of the Office of Education from July 1, 2012 to that of the Office of Education, and assist the superintendent of the Office of Education who has overall control over administrative affairs, such as education affairs for schools within the jurisdiction of the I Office of Education, construction of various facilities and supply of educational materials, etc.

Defendant

B is the friendship of Defendant A, and Defendant C is the operator of the Dispute Settlement Council (hereinafter referred to as the “J”) which supplies U.S. Microfrates Education Software to the I Office of Education, and K is the operator of the Dispute Settlement Council (hereinafter referred to as the “L”) which implements solar power generation projects against the I Office of Education.

1. Defendant A

A. From December 2012 to September 2013, the Defendant received a bribe of KRW 18,142,500,000, in total, in exchange for the provision of convenience, the Defendant received a bribe of KRW 18,142,50,00, in total, five times as indicated in the Schedule of Crimes (i) from the International Office of Education, in response to the solicitation that “L provides various convenience, including the smooth progress of solar power generation projects promoted by L on the rooftop of schools within the jurisdiction of the I Office of Education, to provide information on the business conducted by L,” from K. In return for the provision of convenience, the Defendant received a bribe of KRW 18,142,50,000, in total, by receiving entertainment in total of 18 times, as described in the Schedule of Crimes in the Annex of the Attached Table of Crimes.

B. At the place of entertainment bars from January 2013 to September 2013, 2013, the Defendant of acceptance of bribe from the donor C and acceptance of bribe from a third party, upon the request of C to provide various convenience, such as providing information on the business conducted by J to the Office of Education, including the smooth extension of the ms’ software contract supplied by J to the Office of Education. In return for the provision of the above convenience, B was falsely listed as the staff of J in the name of B from January 2013 to September 2013.