logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.06.14 2017고단1889
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(성적목적공공장소침입)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A 47 years of age is a public company member with C fishery products in Busan Seo-gu B.

On July 6, 2016, at around 22:27, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim F (18 tax, leisure, name) entered the toilet into the victim F (18 tax, name) in the Busan City E Station female toilets, the Busan City Railroad E Station, and (b) intruded the victim into the toilet No. 2 column, and then intruded into the toilet No. 1 column of the toilet for sexual purposes, such as cutting down the door, cutting down the gate, cutting down the face, and cutting down the gate, and then cutting down the victim who was melted in the toilet No. 1 column of the toilet.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. Article 12 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes under Article 12 of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts subject to each investigation report (No. 1 and 4 of the list of evidence);

1. When the conviction of the Defendant who has registered personal information of Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act becomes final and conclusive, the Defendant becomes a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obliged to submit personal information to relevant agencies as prescribed in Article 43 of the same Act.

In full consideration of the age of the defendant exempted from the disclosure order or notification order, risk of repeating a crime, type, motive, process, seriousness of the crime in this case, the degree and expected side effects of the defendant's disadvantage due to the disclosure order or notification order, the preventive effect and effect of the sexual crime subject to registration which may be achieved, the effect of the protection of the victim, etc., there are special circumstances under which the disclosure of personal information under the proviso to Article 49 (1) and the proviso to Article 50 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse shall not be notified.

Therefore, the defendant is judged.

arrow