logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.12.15 2017노4496
자동차손해배상보장법위반등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below states that the defendant would not repeat the crime of this case because he violated his mistake; the defendant seems to be healthy due to high blood pressure, traffic, etc.; however, it is recognized that the defendant operated a vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance without a driver's license and repeated the same crime even though the investigation was conducted by the defendant while he operated the vehicle without a mandatory insurance, and the defendant who operated the above vehicle without a mandatory insurance and received a summary order of a fine is not aware of the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Evacuation Vehicle) committed by running the above vehicle and operated the above vehicle again, and thus, the sentence of imprisonment is inevitable. The defendant was punished by imprisonment. The defendant was bound by the crime of this case, and the defendant was committed by assaulting other prisoners while living a prison life, etc.; the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relation, circumstances after the crime of this case, etc., and all of the records and the sentencing conditions of this case as stated in the judgment of the court below are not justified, and the defendant's assertion is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.

arrow