logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.02.13 2018고단6643
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2018, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of Lone Star Village Bus (CC Routes), was driving the said vehicle on September 21, 2018 and proceeded along three lanes from the high-speed amusement park to the entrance of the F apartment store at a speed of about 18-24 km at the speed of about 18-24 km.

At this point, it is a place where a sign of a children protection zone is installed on the surface and a road is designated as a children protection zone. In such a case, the driver has a duty of care to accurately check the traffic conditions on the front side and the right side while paying attention to the safety of children and to prevent accidents by driving safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the victim G (9 years of age) who crosses the road from the side of the F apartment to the E elementary school, to go beyond the road, depending on the pedestrian green signals in the crosswalk which was installed in the right side of the vehicle by negligence in the right side of the Defendant, depending on the place deviating from the crosswalk according to the pedestrian green signals in the crosswalk.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the opening of a copy in the upper left-hand body, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Sponsoring vehicles and the kinds of victims, shoess, and photographs;

1. On-site map;

1. An accident site photograph;

1. Four copies of a photograph of the injured part of the victim, and a photograph of the father of the injured part of the victim;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Blue boxes and video CDs;

1. Determination on the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion as a result of analysis

1. Whether the instant accident site is a child protection zone, the Defendant and the defense counsel set up a sign to the opposite side at the time of the instant accident, and thus, the place of the instant accident does not fall under the child protection zone.

arrow