A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Seized evidence Nos. 1 and 2 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On August 22, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 22, 2015 at the Busan detention center.

"2016 Highest 5768"

1. On September 16, 2016, the Defendant, at around D frequency D located in Busan Dongdong-gu, Busan on September 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the phrase “not yet complete investigation” in relation to the Defendant’s female living together and the Defendant’s separate criminal case, i.e., “I do not complete investigation”; (b) assaulted the Defendant at two times the victim’s chest and ship on drinking.

"2016 Highest 7803"

2. A special assault Defendant was committed on November 29, 2016, on the ground that he borrowed KRW 7 million from the Defendant in Gandong-gu, Busan, the victim H (43 years) from the Defendant did not properly repay the amount of KRW 7 million, and that he was said to be the Defendant’s address while taking a bath against the Defendant’s demand for repayment.

Chewing, "Pule flachi", resulting in the deduction of excessive (12 cm in length) from the knife knife, which is a dangerous object in the upper knife, and then threatening the victim as the knife knife.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 5768"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. The protocol of the police statement made to E (the defendant and his defense counsel are sealed only once the defendant has pushed the victim's chests and ships by hand, etc. and did not stop once the victim's chests and ships by drinking;

The argument is asserted.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, ① the victim’s statements are reliable in a specific and consistent manner, ② the entire circumstances of this case, ③ the Defendant’s statements are consistent.