logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.11.11 2015고정649
과실치상
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around 19:00 on August 31, 2014, as a member of D club, after completing a regular meeting of the club at the F restaurant located in Busan, Busan, the chairperson of the club, and the defendant A, the chairperson of the Council, "I do not want to see" and "I do not want to see" the defendant A as an embezzlement of membership fees of the club, and the defendant A, the chairperson of the Association, "I do not want to see" and "I do not want to do so". The defendant A, while the defendant was negligent in being pushed the victim B to the truster where B is seated, the victim suffered injury in need of 6 weeks of medical treatment, such as E and her mother.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each statute on witness G, H and I’s respective statutory statements;

1. Relevant Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant A and the defense counsel under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of the workhouse

1. The summary of the assertion is the fact that Defendant A had the victim go beyond B while disputing B, but there is no fact that the victim was faced with the victim. Therefore, the injury suffered by the victim is not related to Defendant A.

2. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the court’s comprehensive review of the evidence duly adopted by this court, i.e., (i) the investigative agency and the members of the club were gathered on the day of the instant case in this court; (ii) the victim and the Defendant A consistently stated that the testimony at the time was delivered to the hospital to the hospital to the hospital to 119 after they exceeded the above level, including the victim; and (ii) the testimony at the time was different in detail from the other in detail, but the fact that the testimony at the time was exceeded the dispute between the Defendant A and B at the time, and the fact that the victim was escorted to the hospital because the victim was dead, cannot find any particular reason for the victim being injured.

arrow