The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The text of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected to four months of imprisonment.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the various circumstances, including the fact that the Defendant had already been sentenced to punishment over several times for the same kind of crime, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment on March 17, 2010 with prison labor and released from prison on March 17, 2010, and the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crime, and the Defendant committed the instant crime again, etc., the Defendant’s age and happiness environment, etc., even considering that the Defendant paid 200,000 won to the victim of the alcohol value, the Defendant’s assertion is unreasonable as it is too unreasonable to the extent that the Defendant’s punishment should be reversed. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is rejected.

3. According to the conclusion, the appeal by the defendant is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. (However, since it is clear that the term "two months of imprisonment" in the order of the court below is a clerical error in the "four months of imprisonment", it is so decided as per Disposition under Article 25(1) of the Rules