Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a Bknife car.
At around 13:20 on November 8, 2013, the Defendant came to proceed from the side of the week to Gwangju, one lane out of the two lanes near the Southern IC in order to arrange the mountain area, such as Nasi-si.
At the time of the defendant's proceeding, the victim C(56 years old) driver's D e-sports cargo was in advance, so the driver had a duty of care to secure safety distance and drive safely by checking the right and the right and the right.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and negligently driven Mad victim C while driving on the side of the Southern ICT and reduced the reported speed of E-wing-franchising freight vehicle, and the Defendant found it late and received the back portion of the victim C’s freight vehicle with the front part of the passenger car.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim F(49 years of age) and the victim G (52 years of age) by occupational negligence, such as “influoral salt and tension,” respectively, for two weeks of medical treatment.
2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be punished against the express intent of the victim under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. Since it is apparent in the record that the defendant submitted an agreement containing the intent of the victims that he/she would not want punishment on March 5, 2014, the prosecution of this case is dismissed under Article 327(6) of the