1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On September 29, 192, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant with respect to B apartment Nos. 101, 1004 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and subsequently entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant, the Plaintiff was on December 24, 2012, and the lease agreement was renewed at KRW 2 years for lease, deposit deposit, 7,690,000, monthly rent of KRW 120,400.

Upon completion of the marriage report with C on July 5, 198, the Plaintiff reported the divorce on April 22, 2013. On May 30, 2013, the Plaintiff changed C to the head of a household on his resident registration, and had C continue to reside in the instant apartment as well as his/her father.

On May 31, 2013, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment 17 Dong 616, and resides in the above apartment from that time.

After the Defendant terminated the above lease contract on October 21, 2013, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for requesting the delivery of a building (Seoul Central District Court 2013Da334186), which was rendered a favorable judgment on May 15, 2014. The said lawsuit is pending in the appellate court (Seoul Central District Court 2014Na37322) as the Plaintiff’s appeal.

Around June 17, 2014, the Plaintiff certified a transfer/acquisition agreement with the purport that he/she transferred the right to lease of the instant apartment to C as of March 15, 2013, and applied for a change in the approval of the transfer of the said right to lease to the Defendant around July 16, 2014.

Accordingly, on July 29, 2014, the Defendant respondeded that the lease contract was terminated to the Plaintiff and that the judgment was rendered by filing a lawsuit for requesting the delivery of a building. Therefore, the Defendant respondeded that the change of name for the application for the application for the

(hereinafter referred to as “instant reply”). [The grounds for recognition] A’s evidence 1 through 4, A’s evidence 6 through 9, A’s evidence 5-1, 2, and B’s defense prior to the purport of the entire pleadings, and the Plaintiff’s claim for revocation based on the premise that the instant reply is an administrative disposition.