The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Violation of restrictions on the operation of the cargo vehicle driver's temporary violation of the summary order subject to review and the summary of the facts charged (to be supported by the Gwangju District Court) by the summary order subject to review by the number of cases (to be supported by the Gwangju District Court) and the violation of the restriction on the operation of the Ulsan Highway's temporary violation on December 2, 1993, 20:15 J. 2015 J. 2015 J. 1385 J. 21, 1993, J. 21487 CD 208:52 Sept. 21, 1993, 32015 J. 1386 J. 94 J. 4, 251 EF 15:56, Mar. 15, 1994

2. Of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995) which applies to each summary order subject to review, the part concerning a violation under Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the same Act has become retroactively effective due to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality 201Hun-Ga24, Dec. 29, 201, and thus, the Defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.