1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's selective claims against the defendant B added in the trial are dismissed.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows: (a) the court shall dismiss the “F” of the fifth and last line below the second judgment of the court of first instance as “E”; and (b) with respect to the selective claims against Defendant B added by the plaintiff in the court of first instance as the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance, unless the following determination is added to the corresponding part, and therefore, (c) it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that, at his option, Defendant B agreed to transfer the ownership of the instant land to the Plaintiff around 2003, Defendant B is obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership based on the said agreement.

The plaintiff's above assertion is not sufficient to admit the plaintiff's above assertion with only the evidence of Nos. 17 through 24, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the part of the plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant Eul, which seeks the registration of the transfer of ownership by subrogation of the defendant C, shall be dismissed, and the plaintiff's claim against the defendant C shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in this conclusion, and all of the plaintiff's appeal shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the plaintiff's selective claim against the defendant Eul added in the trial shall be dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.