logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.10.07 2020가단9813
제3자이의
Text

1. The original copy of the payment order with force of the Suwon District Court 2020 tea 1715 against Nonparty C.

Reasons

1. Indication of Claim: The Defendant seized each movable in the name of the obligation indicated in the separate sheet, but each of the above movable property is owned by the Plaintiff (the Plaintiff directly purchased the goods listed in the separate sheet in 2004 before Nonparty C and 201 remarriedd in 2004, and the wall glocks purchased only after Earbation and Earbation, but this was also purchased directly by the Plaintiff because C did not know all of the money such as living expenses). The execution of the above seizure should be denied.

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow