logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.07 2014나40205
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From August 31, 2002, the Plaintiff was convicted of having committed a crime of releasing animals from the Health Center owned by another person without permission while working as the representative of C, an animal care organization, from around August 31, 201.

나. 피고는 2013. 5. 7. 15:39경 인터넷 D 사이트(E)에 “F”이라는 대화명으로 접속하여, 성명불상자가 “시발 나 고소당함ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ”이라는 제목으로 자신이 원고로부터 고소된 사실과 함께 “G” 메뉴에 게시되었던 “H” 제목 하에 원고의 얼굴 사진이 포함되어 있는 “I”라는 기사가 첨부된 게시글에 대한 댓글로 “어휴 야이시발년아 고소해버ㅏ”라는 내용의 글을 게시하였다.

C. On June 2013, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant on the ground that he/she posted the instant notice on the Internet website that enables an unspecified number of people to verify the content of the text, but the Chuncheon District Prosecutors’ Office was found to have committed an offense but decided not to institute a disposition of suspending indictment on the ground that the Defendant is a juvenile, who is a first offender, and is against the law.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 4 through 7, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the above basic facts, the defendant used a language that may undermine the plaintiff's social reputation on the bulletin board of the Internet D website where many unspecified persons can confirm the contents of writing, thereby insulting the plaintiff, and in light of the empirical rule, it is obvious that the plaintiff suffered mental pain. Thus, the defendant is obliged to pay the plaintiff the above damages in money.

I would like to say.

B. Furthermore, it is reasonable to determine the amount of consolation money as KRW 300,000 in consideration of the various circumstances shown in the argument of this case, such as the content and purpose of the article posted by the defendant.

arrow