logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.05.21 2018누77045
반환명령 등 처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Regarding the instant case, the reasoning of the first instance court is as follows: ① in Part 4, 17 of the judgment of the first instance court, the phrase “6 evidence” shall be deemed to be “6, 7 evidence”; ② in Part 4, 19, the phrase “the above written disposition” shall be deemed to be “the payment guide sent along with the above written disposition”; ③ in Part 5, the message sent to D on June 21, 2018, “the Plaintiff’s actual manager shall be deemed to have been issued KRW 5,209, 890; KRW 8,335,800; KRW 10,419,780 of the above written judgment of the second instance court; ② the Plaintiff shall be deemed to have been given an additional statement of KRW 5,00; ④ The Plaintiff shall be deemed to have been aware of the fact that there was no additional statement of KRW 868,315,12,000; ④ The Plaintiff shall be deemed to have been given an additional statement of KRW 950, 19,50.

arrow