The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are favorable for the victims of the instant crime and the victims of the instant violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (domination) and the victims of the instant crime who intend to be punished against the Defendant.

However, in full view of all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is deemed to be proper, and it does not seem to be unfair because it is too too too unreasonable, and thus, the defendant's argument about the sentencing of this case is without merit, since the defendant's argument about the sentencing of this case is without merit, in light of the following: (a) there are many records that the defendant was punished as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act and a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving).

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.