A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. On October 22, 2014, the Defendant committed indecent act by compulsion: (a) around 21:50, at “D” restaurant in which the victim C (here, 21 years of age) located in Sinh City B (hereinafter referred to as “D”); (b) the victim’s order telephone was received; and (c) the victim’s order was followed by the victim, and the victim’s order was pushed back to the victim so that the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her part and her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

2. 업무방해 피고인은 2014. 10. 22. 21:50경 시흥시 B에 있는 피해자 E가 운영하는 ‘D’ 음식점에서, 아르바이트를 하던 C를 강제추행하였다는 사실로 C와 말다툼을 하던 중 화가 나 음식점 안에 다른 손님들이 있는 상태에서 위 C 등에게 ‘이 썅년들이, 장사를 못하게 하겠다. 씨발년, 좆같은 년’이라고 욕설을 하고 위 음식점 내에서 소리를 지르는 등 약 20분 동안 소란을 피웠다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

3. 모욕 피고인은 2014. 10. 22. 21:50경 시흥시 B에 있는 ‘D’ 음식점에서, 강제추행 신고를 받고 출동한 피해자인 시흥경찰서 소속 경사 F 외 3명 등 경찰관들이 피고인에게 신분증을 제시하고 사건 경위에 대하여 진술해줄 것을 요청하자 위 음식점을 운영하는 E와 다른 손님들이 있는 가운데 피해자에게 ‘짭새 새끼야, 니들이 뭔데, 내가 뭐 잘못했어, 병신새끼야, 할 수 있으면 해봐’라고 큰소리로 말하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to F, C, and E;

1. Interference with business affairs under Article 298 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) and Article 313 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, etc.