Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Yangju-gun-gun D 539 (hereinafter “instant assessment land”) stated that the F, who resides in Seosung-gun, on October 10, 1913, was under the circumstances.
B. Since then, the instant land was changed to C 1,782 square meters in Yangju-si due to the change of administrative district name, etc. (hereinafter “the instant land”).
C. On April 30, 1957 (Short 4290), the registration of ownership preservation was completed under Defendant G’s name on April 30, 1957, and thereafter, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on October 7, 1989 in the name of H, I, J, and K on November 29, 198, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on October 16, 1997 in the name of M on June 18, 1998, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on May 18, 2002 in the name of the Defendant on June 20, 2002.
On January 18, 1935, N, the Plaintiff’s fleet, died on January 18, 1935, and O, the Australia’s heir inherited N’s own property. On August 13, 1974, P and children Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, and Y were the inheritor, but P were the inheritor on April 17, 198; P died on September 16, 200; U died on November 15, 2001; Q and R, S, V, W, X, Z, AB, AB, and U.S.’s heir on November 26, 2004; Q and Q and Q were the heir’s heir’s right to inherited property on October 26, 2005; and P and Q were the heir’s heir’s right to inherited property on May 17, 201.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 to 12 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings
2. Each assertion by both parties;
A. The instant land, which is the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim, was owned by N as it was assessed by N, the Plaintiff’s fleet, and it was solely inherited by the Plaintiff via O and Q. Accordingly, the instant land is owned by the Plaintiff, and Nonparty G was completed with respect to the instant land.