logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.25 2016고단7759
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a person who, from C in 2005, leased to 200 million won the deposit money of the E Ma Ma Ma 401, 501, and 502 in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

On November 2, 2006, when it was difficult for the Defendant to receive the deposit due to the commencement of voluntary auction at the Suwon District Court F real estate in relation to the above Maridong building, the Defendant conspiredd on February 7, 2007, that “where it is difficult for the Defendant to collect the deposit through lawful procedures, the Defendant filed a false lien report and the payment order with the court under the name of G to collect the deposit under the name of G, and received the payment from the successful bidder for the purpose of the lien agreement.” On February 9, 2007, G filed a false lien report on the grounds of KRW 1.4 billion for the false claim for the payment of the construction price on February 12, 2007, and filed a false request for the payment order against the Defendant on February 12, 2007, and filed a false request for the payment order without confirmation.

On October 21, 2009, G presented a false letter to the victim H who wishes to buy the said letter or building at a coffee shop where it is impossible to know the trade name in the vicinity of the Pyeongtaek-si, Annyang-si, 2009, G, while indicating the false letter or the interior construction contract, a quotation, a payment order, etc., on the part of the victim H, who wants to buy the said letter or building, the right of retention was reported as KRW 1.4 billion because he did not receive any construction cost at all from C, and the payment order that can receive KRW 1.4 billion against C was finalized, but the right of retention is also abandoned on the part of the State.

Accordingly, the victim's trade name in Gyeyang-dong on April 18, 2010 is not known to the victim, and at the office of a certified judicial scrivener whose market value is equivalent to KRW 190,000,000,000, I/3 and the market value of KRW 210,000,000,000,000.

arrow