Text
1. It is confirmed that each obligation listed in the separate sheet against the Plaintiff against the Defendant does not exist.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff entered into each of the instant contracts between the Plaintiff and the vice-party (each of the contracts described in paragraphs (1) through (4) below) on March 1, 2013 (hereinafter “sub-party”)
(2) On April 1, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into an e-line delivery contract with the e-line subcontractor that the Plaintiff delivers the goods requested from the e-mail, and that the e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail.
3) On August 1, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into an integrated logistics contract with the Plaintiff on August 1, 2013, stating that “Filchis entered into a contract for delivery with the Plaintiff for part of the delivery business requested by the Plaintiff, and the vice versa shall be paid on the 25th of the following month after settling accounts for the distribution agency fees from the Plaintiff.” (4) On October 1, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into an integrated logistics contract with the vice versa to the effect that “Filchis provide the distribution service, such as goods transportation, and the vice versa shall be paid a logistics service fee by the Plaintiff pursuant to the annexed agreement by the owner of goods.”
① On October 1, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into an annexed agreement pursuant to the aforementioned integrated logistics agreement, stating that “SPC, SPC, SPC, Saline Korea, health care center, new global food network, and to pay logistics service fees to the Plaintiff on the 25th of the following month.”
② On November 1, 2013, the Plaintiff is vice versa.