All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because each sentence of the court below against the Defendants (the 2 years of suspended execution and additional collection of 5670,000 won in 8 months of imprisonment, Defendant B: fine of 3 million won) is too uneased.

2. The judgment of the court below should be strictly punished against the defendants considering the facts that Defendant A operated a marina business in the course of operating a marina business, operated a marina business, operated a business in the name of Defendant B, and abetted the criminal to commit a crime in preparation for the police control, such as arranging commercial sex acts. Defendant B submitted a written statement to the police that operated a commercial sex business in lieu of the defendant A, and Defendant A had a record of being punished once a fine, including arranging commercial sex acts, etc. However, the defendants should be punished strictly. On the other hand, the defendants led to the confession of each of the crimes in this case and go against their mistake. Defendant B is the first offender; Defendant B has no criminal history exceeding the fine; Defendant B has no criminal history; Defendant B has no other criminal history beyond the fine; Defendant A has no other special reason to change the sentence of the court below at the trial; and Defendant B has no other reason to change the punishment of the court below; Defendant B's age, character, character, intelligence and environment, motive, circumstance, method, method, and result of the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime.

3. In conclusion, since each appeal against the Defendants by the prosecutor is without merit, all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.