logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.02.02 2015고단3628
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person engaged in driving of a low-priced vehicle.

1. On August 16, 2015, the Defendant driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.116% from the day front of the Liber hotel located in the Gu Gidong-dong of a member of Ansan-si on August 21, 2015 to the day front of the 6th main road located in the same Dong-dong-dong.

2. A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., an escapeing vehicle) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (ii.e., an accident), the Defendant driven the above vehicle at the time of a day in the same manner as paragraph (1) and proceeded directly from the direction of the citizen market to the front side of the Hosan Elementary School located in the Kulsan-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce speed and drive safely according to good faith.

Nevertheless, the former signal was neglected to stop, and the same speed was proceeding at the same speed, and the part on the left side of the victim C(30 years old, female driving) driving, which is normally straight on the right side from the left side of the course, was shocked into the front part of the vehicle driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim and the victim E (31 years and south) in each of the two weeks of the aforementioned occupational negligence, respectively, and escaped without taking measures, such as providing rescue to the victim on the spot, while destroying the repair cost of the victim’s vehicle to the extent that the amount equivalent to KRW 4,580,134 is equivalent to the repair cost of the victim’s vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. (1) (2) of the traffic accident report, photographs related to the traffic accident, field photographs of the traffic accident, inquiry of the results of crackdown on drinking driving, medical certificate (net 22,23), and application of written estimate-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Criminal Act concerning the crime as provided in the corresponding Article of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes

arrow