Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for three years, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for two years, respectively.
except that from the date of this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A was a person who was working as the purchasing team leader from around 1995 to July 31, 2017 from the victim G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "victim Co., Ltd.") in Ansan-si, and Defendant C is a working person who, from August 2008, served as the deputy head of the production support team from the victim Co., Ltd. to July 31, 2017, entered computerized data on the processing and sale of the electric lectures into the production support team. Defendant B is a representative director of H Co., Ltd. in a transaction relationship with the victim company.
Defendant
A, while serving as the purchasing team leader at the victim company and serving in charge of the purchase and release of the electric power plate, he purchased electric power plates from Posco and kept them in the distribution warehouse of Posco located at Port, and processed the electric power plate in the victim company as necessary, or transported it to the partner company and entrusted it to the victim company or the entrusted company. In this process, it became known that in the above process, as if the victim company or the entrusted company suffered electric power plates or sent them, the transmission of the electric power plate may not be dismissed if the false electronic data is inputd.
Since August 2006, Defendant A conspired with Defendant B in collusion with Defendant B to deduct the electric power plate from Defendant B in the above way, Defendant B sold it and conspired to divide the price therefor. Since around October 2008, Defendant C conspireded to enter false electronic data into the market according to Defendant A’s instructions.
1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint crime [the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement)] is committed at the victim’s office around August 24, 2006; Defendant A entered the product number EAG094C (large 4,100km) in the victim’s company and processed it with the victim’s company, which is equivalent to the market price of KRW 12,279,50,00, and then false employees who are not aware of such fact.