Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On December 27, 2015, around 23:30 on December 27, 2015, the Defendant argued that the Defendant drinked D and alcohol, a workplace, at the room located in the main place of “C” located in Songpa-gu Seoul Underground 1, Songpa-gu Seoul, and that that end, the main place of the Defendant tried to engage in the desire and to engage in any harm, thereby filing a 112 report.

While police officers F, etc. belonging to the Seoul Song-gu Police Station E District in receipt of the above report have heard the case from the main owner, the defendant tried to move D out of the main room to the room by force.

On December 28, 2015, the police officers avoided D from the main point of view, and the defendant tried to keep D from leaving D again in front of the building in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government into the main point of view on December 28, 2015.

Therefore, the police officer F, etc. were prevented, and the defendant, as a result, assaulted the F's bridge by driving the F's bridge by drinking, thereby obstructing the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and investigation of crimes, public peace and order maintenance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Penalty)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the nature of the crime committed by a police officer serving a reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not be somewhat weak, considering the fact that the Defendant had no record of punishment prior to the instant case, the Defendant appears to repent in depth, and the police officer who suffered damage appeals against the Defendant.