1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

. It is clear that it is a place where “the matters, etc. otherwise used” are indicated, and it also includes “the fact that part of the instant real estate is being used as studio different from that disclosed in the building ledger, etc.” The Plaintiffs provided an explanation as to the contents indicated in the description of the object of brokerage.

“A purchaser” or his name was written in the last part of the description confirming the object of brokerage at the time of the instant sales contract. In addition, the Defendant C prepared a document analyzing the profitability of the instant real estate under the title “M commercial building” at the time of the conclusion of the instant sales contract, and the above profitability analysis document was provided to the Plaintiffs through N around that time. The above profitability analysis document is written on the “business type of 2-4 stories” in the “business type” column of the above profitability analysis document, and the “studio 40 room-30,000 won (management fees)” in the “studio 40 won” column of the “special engineer” column of the above specification. In other words, the above statement on the “studio 40 billion won” is written on the “studio 50,000,000 won, which appears to be paid to the Plaintiffs at the time of the instant sales contract (the “studio 40,000,000 won,” while the statement on the “studio 50,04,000,00.

3) A confirmation description of the object of the above residential brokerage (hereinafter referred to as “the method” is indicated in the column of “whether the building was in violation of the building ledger,” but the term “whether the building was in violation of the building ledger” as referred to in the above paragraph is equivalent.