Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 10, 2014, at around 00:50, the Defendant received a report on “the protection of a drunk person” in front of the exit of the newcheon Station No. 3 located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and sent the report from C, etc. affiliated with the Seoul Songpa Police Station B District Unit, which “I received and sent the notification to the police officer. I have been able to do. I have been able to do. I have been able to do. I will do. I will do. I will do. I will do. I will do. I will do. I will do. I will am. I will do. I will am. I will we will live. I will live in the police. I will we will am. I will we will we will live in the police. I would like to am. I would like to am and son to am on their s

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and maintenance of order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written statement prepared D or E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation and on the spot visit the case of obstruction of performance of official duties;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts and the choice of punishment (the choice of fines in consideration of the fact that it is not deemed that the degree of violence or obstruction of performance of official duties cannot be serious as the day he/she was punished under the influence of alcohol, etc.);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;