logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.08.30 2012고합349
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인은 2012. 8. 31. 15:30경 안양시 동안구 경수대로 508번길에 있는 안양교도소 제2동 1층 13실에서 같은 거실의 수용자인 피해자 C(37세)가 “왜 혼자 밥을 먹느냐 ”고 물어보면서 귀찮게 한다는 이유로 “씹새끼야! 내 마음이다.”라고 욕을 하면서 오른손 손바닥으로 위 C의 왼쪽 얼굴을 1회 때리고, 피해자 D(62세)가 위 C로부터 신고를 받고 출동한 교도관에게 피고인이 C를 때리는 것을 보았다고 말했다는 이유로 D의 얼굴을 양 주먹으로 수회 때리고 오른발로 D의 몸을 수회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim C, and applied the victim D to the left-hand co(1cm), the left-hand neck(1.5mm), the left-hand neck(2cm).

2. On August 31, 2013, after undergoing an investigation by a correctional officer with regard to the assault, etc. described in paragraph (1), the Defendant committed assault against each of the above victims at the time of drinking by C on the ground that the Defendant got his/her own body and returned to the above ward on August 31, 2013, a correctional officer went to the above ward, and a correctional officer went to the ward, who took the door of the ward, and went to the face of D due to drinking, and that the above C’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement of E, F, D, and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on record of prisoners;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and the choice of imprisonment), and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel among concurrent crimes as to Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 (Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes as provided for in the most severe Crimes) of the Criminal Act

1. The main point of the argument is the victim D's wife is capable of natural therapy, and thus does not constitute an injury to the crime of injury.

2. The “injury” under Article 257 of the Criminal Act is determined.

arrow