1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 2014, the Plaintiff’s father C entered into the instant insurance contract with the Defendant and B, with the insurance period from March 11, 2014 to December 2, 2014, concluded an automobile insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) including a special agreement with the effect that the insured was dead due to his/her own physical accident, the amount of KRW 30 million shall be paid, and the amount of KRW 15 million shall be limited to the insurance amount at the time of the injury (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

B. The occurrence of a traffic accident and C’s death (1) occurred on October 7, 2014, and C returned to Korea after completing a outpatient treatment at the Sinsan University Hospital located in Yongsan-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City on October 7, 2014, and suffered injury, such as a cage cage at the right-hand cage at the front part of the said vehicle’s parking fees settlement office, which was received as the front part of the said vehicle.

(2) On October 11, 2014, the following day after the instant traffic accident, C hospitalized in the chest branch of the said hospital on October 8, 2014. From October 9, 2014, a large volume of snow death began and continued to exist. On October 10, 2014, around 08:35, a change in the consciousness of anti-mixed status and the heart suspension took place to the patient room after cardiopulmonary resuscitation, but on October 11, 2014, C moved to the patient room after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

The direct private person was diagnosed as a "malmical shock", and the cause of the Hemal hemical shock was diagnosed as a "malmalmical shock", and the cause of the submalmical part was diagnosed as a multi-malmical part.

C. The plaintiff in the inheritance relationship is "C et al." et al.

A) Around October 12, 2015, the deceased’s children were transferred with claims for the remainder of the insurance proceeds except their respective inheritance shares from other inheritors of the deceased on or around October 12, 2015. 【Ground of Recognition】 without dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including each number number, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether liability for the payment of insurance proceeds arises;

A. The plaintiff alleged by the parties is a traffic accident of this case by the deceased.