A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:50 on June 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) faced a disturbance in the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C”; (b) caused a disturbance, such as destroying the flowers displayed in the Kabter while in which the Kabter and D and E are in physical fighting; (c) was removed from the Victim F (V, 51) who is an employee of the said business establishment; (d) was faced with the head of the victimized person; and (e) was inflicted an injury on the victim, such as beer cupped cup, and tensions, which are dangerous articles on the table.

2. At the time, at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim G, the owner of the Defendant’s work, D and E, who is the owner of the Defendant’s work fighting; and (b) expressed the disturbance to the victim G, who is the owner of the Defendant’s “C” above, the Defendant, who was the owner of the Defendant’s work fighting; and (c) continuously laid the beer’s disease and the beer’s disease on the floor in turn; and (d) continuously laid the beer’s disease and the beer’s disease on the floor in turn, and kept the F, who would be able

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force for about 10 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on field photographing photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury) and 314 (1) (a point of interference with business and choice of imprisonment with prison labor) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Although there are several records of punishment for the same crime as the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, in light of the fact that each of the crimes of this case was committed, the responsibility for the crime of this case is not minor, but there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine for the same crime since 1985.