logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.18 2016노1038
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The gist of the prosecutor’s appeal (unfair sentencing) of the instant crime is unreasonable in light of the following facts: (a) the Defendant taken a body part of the victim’s body that may cause sexual humiliation or shame, such as her bet and her bet, etc. over 14 times in total, and the nature of the crime is not good; (b) the lower court’s order to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 3,000,000 won and 40 hours; and (c) the sentence of the lower court, which sentenced the order to complete a sexual assault treatment program and sentenced

Judgment

The defendant's mistake is against the defendant's depth, and his family members are leading the defendant.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment; (b) the Defendant’s photographing of the Defendant is mainly the body of the lower body and is not the direct photographing of her mar or her mar; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime; and (d) all the conditions of the sentencing specified in the instant records and arguments, including the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unfeasible and thus, is not deemed unfair, and thus, the

In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow