The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The facts charged in this case and the judgment of the court below

A. A. The summary of the facts charged of this case 1) The Defendant’s defamation on February 8, 2014, on which it is impossible to know the trade name at the Cheongju-si around February 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at a coffee shop where the victim’s mother is not the victim’s child; (b) although the victim did not receive so from another male and female; (c) but did not have any fact between the victim and another male, the victim’s child, etc., the Defendant: (d) C and D “B’s slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick; and (d) F slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick slick sl.

knee kneel kneelelel, knee knee kneelel in its kneele.

Then, the victim's reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by pointing out the following: (a) Then, she was found to have a son, son, son, son, and son, who had been drinking from that time to that time, and (b) she caused a imperme, she was fluent, so that she could stop the imperme and cause the failure thereby."

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of each of the facts charged in the instant case’s defamations based on each of the false facts as of February 8, 2014 and September 19, 2017 as of September 2, 2017. On the other hand, the lower court acquitted the Defendant on the part of the grounds that there is no evidence to acknowledge that the alleged facts were false with respect to the defamations based on the false facts as of September 19, 2017.