The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Gyeonggi-do Sucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, and 27 parcels of charges were incorporated into the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport from the Defendant’s possession as of December 15, 2015 by an expropriation ruling for the implementation of the E Road Construction Works. The Defendant is a person who has a right to livestock facilities obstacles, such as livestock pens on the above land.

Any person who has a right to the land to be expropriated for public works or goods on such land shall deliver or transfer such land or goods to the project executor by no later than the commencement date of expropriation.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not move livestock facilities, such as livestock pens, to a person who has a right to livestock facilities, such as livestock pens on the above land, even though he/she had to move livestock facilities, such as livestock pens, until December 15, 2015, which was the date of commencement of confinement.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the Central Land Expropriation Committee rendered a ruling on October 22, 2015 on the expropriation of D and 27 parcels owned by the Defendant on December 15, 2015 (hereinafter “livestock facilities in this case”) including livestock facilities, such as cattle pens, etc. on the ground upon the commencement date of expropriation. However, the Defendant’s assertion on compensation for losses in the livestock industry is not accepted on the ground that it does not constitute business losses. ② The Defendant’s assertion on compensation for losses in the livestock industry was not subject to administrative litigation (Seoul Administrative Court 2016Guhap6038), and thereafter, filed a ruling on April 13, 2017 (Seoul Administrative Court 25,261, 200, 300, 200, 3000, 200, 3000, 3000, 200, 3000, 3000, 200, 300