logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.08.23 2017고단1601
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant

C Imprisonment with prison labor of six months, and each of the defendants A and B shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

Defendant

A and B shall be subject to the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 4 months for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Northern District Court on February 10, 2017, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on the 18th of the same month. On June 1, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents at the Seoul Northern District Court, and filed an appeal for the remaining trial.

Defendant

C was sentenced on February 5, 2016 by the Incheon District Court to be sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment for the crime of forging private documents, etc., and the judgment was finalized on the 13th of the same month. On October 7, 2016, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year and four months of the suspension of execution to be punished by imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court on the 15th of the same month. On October 19, 2016, the judgment was finalized on November 8, 2016 after being sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court on the 19th of the same month. On April 5, 2017, the judgment became final and conclusive on the 13th of the same month.

[2] On May 28, 2015, Defendant C transferred the EM automobile owned by D from D to another person under the condition of the succession of installments, and received delivery of the said automobile. At that time, Defendant A and Defendant B stated, “I would like to obtain money by obtaining a loan from D MM automobile as collateral,” and the Defendants conspired to forge the loan document in the name of D and attempted to exercise it.

1. On June 22, 2015, Defendant A and Defendant B met the credit service provider F in the cross-fash page located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and Defendant A entered “D”, “G”, “G” in the resident registration number column, and “Won 20,000,000,” respectively, in the loan transaction agreement column as if they were D, and arbitrarily inserted into D’s name after entering the “Won 20,000,000,” respectively.

D The seal of the name shall be affixed, and the loan certificate shall be in the original gold column for the original sheet.

arrow