logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.29 2016가단318305
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff A KRW 484,215,170, and KRW 4,000,000 to the Plaintiff B, respectively, and KRW 1,000,000 for the Plaintiff C, D, and E.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 25, 2016, F, a police officer belonging to the Kimhae Police Station, was driving a G Transport patrol vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) on or around 01:35, in order to avoid inspection and to estimate the volume of the HA vehicle that escaped, and was in violation of the signal from the 3rd Sastro to the court room at the 3rd Sastro road located in the city of Kimhae-si to the 121st century, and was in violation of the signal from the 3rd Sastro road to the jurisdiction of the court at the time of Kimhae-si, a police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the Kimhae-si Police Station, was in line with the signal from the left-hand side of the Defendant vehicle to the right-hand side, resulting in an accident (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

B. In the instant accident, the Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as an injury to an explacy of an explacule, with no open address in two countries.

C. Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C, D, and E are the children of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry and video of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 13, and purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above recognition of the liability for damages, the accident in this case occurred due to the negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle driving in the intersection in violation of the signal, so the defendant, who is the insurer of the defendant vehicle, is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the accident in this case.

On the other hand, according to the Road Traffic Act, the defendant may not stop an emergency motor vehicle even in cases where it is required to stop in accordance with the Road Traffic Act. The driver of any motor vehicle shall temporarily stop or yield the course when an emergency motor vehicle approaches in the intersection or in the vicinity of the intersection. The driver of any motor vehicle shall temporarily stop or yield the course of the motor vehicle. The defendant's vehicle shall use light lights and emergency lights at the time of towing the escape vehicle, and order the suspension of the

arrow