The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant's act of the reasons for appeal does not violate the social norms under Article 20 of the Criminal Act, and constitutes a justifiable act, or the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty despite the victim's implied consent to the defendant's abusive opinion, is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles.

2. On the date and time stated in the facts charged of this case, the Defendant also recognized the fact that the Defendant posted the same article as the stated in the facts charged. The said article is apparent in itself as a part of the facts charged, that the victim’s personal reputation is unafford and insulting the victim.

On the other hand, the core of the defendant's assertion is that since the victim puts a notice first for the purpose of inducing the victim's rasher and the women's desire, it does not go against social rules or by the victim's consent, or that the illegality should be avoided by the victim's consent. However, the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below alone led the victim to the desire to put the victim up the notice first for this purpose.

In addition to the lack of recognition, even if the victim's internal deliberation intent is the same.

As long as it is sufficiently possible to express other methods that can be pointed out by the Defendant as a matter of question, the Defendant’s act of expressing the victim’s body by specifying the victim’s body as stated in the facts charged in the instant case does not constitute a justifiable act, and it is difficult to deem that the victim’s body was disclosed to the public, and the Defendant impliedly accepted the posting of

shall not be deemed to exist.

Therefore, we cannot accept this part of the defendant's assertion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.