logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원(청주) 2020.01.15 2019누1556
감봉처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance. However, even when examining the evidence submitted to the court of first instance in light of the relevant statutes and legal principles, the court of first instance was just in finding the existence of the grounds for each of the disciplinary actions in this case and whether to deviate from or abuse of discretion in disciplinary action, and did not err in its determination as alleged by the plaintiff

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow