Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 20, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and for a special robbery on March 8, 2006, and completed the execution of the sentence at Red Prison on March 8, 2006. On March 9, 2010, this court was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a period of one year and six months for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.), violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.), violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.), and the judgment in June 28, 2010 became final and conclusive on June 28, 2010.

1. On June 17, 2008, at Jung-gu, Busan, the number of assistant employees of "D organization" belonging to "E," the largest violent organization located in Busan, Jung-gu, Busan (hereinafter "D organization C work situation of this case") caused the occurrence of a situation where 3 to 4 of the assistant employees of "E," are on board the vehicle of the assistant employees belonging to "E," set a stringer distance, and driving the vehicle inside the vehicle (hereinafter "D organization C work situation of this case").

Meanwhile, Defendant (1981) indicated as Defendant F (198), G (1980 male), H (1981 male), I (1981 male), J (1983 male), K (1983 male), and L, while considering the evidence examined by this court, Defendant (1981) was indicated as Defendant “Defendant,” it is obvious that the above is a clerical error, and it is not likely that such a situation would hinder Defendant’s exercise of right to defense.

(E), together with (1984 male), M (1986 male) and N (1989 male), is a member of the action group "E" affiliated with the violence organization working in Busan Central District C,O, and P(1989).

The instant D Group C’s work status was reported to F, an organization, through the organization members, to “E.”

Accordingly, F determined that the members of “D organization” intended to engage in so-called “E” work against the members of the “E,” and that the Defendant contacted the Defendant, etc., who is the cause of the latter organization, and gathered under the R in Q Q in Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, and the Defendant called “F NNTA” to N, M, L, etc. in the “groom in Busan, Jung-gu.”