A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 9476"

1. The Defendant was an employee of the FF corporation operated by E, and the Defendant was unable to enter into a lease contract for BMW vehicle according to credit rating, and the Defendant received a vehicle on behalf of E after concluding the BMW X6 vehicle lease contract, and received it, and sentenced E to a good e.g.

On January 31, 2012, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the victim and himself as the lessee, the joint guarantor as the lessee G, and the monthly lease fee of KRW 2,264,537, which is determined as KRW 42 months, by leasing the victim's BM X6 vehicle to the employee of the social service Korea corporation, which was released by the victim's BMW agency located in the Busan metropolitan metropolitan transportation Daegu.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not think that he would have stored and managed the above vehicle in accordance with the above lease contract, and would not pay the lease cost, and had the E use of the vehicle, and had the E pay the lease cost. If E did not pay the lease cost, there was no ability to pay the lease cost of KRW 2,264,537 per month, and the victim did not have the ability to return the vehicle to the victim if requested for the return of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, as seen above, the Defendant, as if he leased the above vehicle normally, concluded a lease contract by deceiving the employees of the victim, and received the above vehicle in an amount equivalent to KRW 101,972,360, and acquired the said vehicle by deceiving E.

"2014 Highest 6635"

2. The Defendant violated the Personal Information Protection Act: (a) from November 201, 2012 to December 2012, 2013, the I Management Team, a mobile phone wholesaler operated by the victim H, and (b) was in charge of settlement and management of the transaction price at the I Management Team, a store affiliated with the victim H.

The defendant operates JJ from September 2013 to around September 2013, which was a trading company of I, even though the J has been a competitor of I's mobile phone.