logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.10.16 2019나54403
소유권이전등기
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing part of the reasoning is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of part of the reasoning as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. According to each description of evidence A to 5, the part of “the deceased E’s heir” (as stated in the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance) is as follows.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Evidence A-1-5, 8, 9 (including the number of pages), E died on December 19, 1966 and died of F in the absence of inheritance registration, etc., and his/her heir died in G, H, I, J, and the plaintiffs, G, H, I, and J respectively, and the deceased in the deceased's heir as his/her child, N, K, L, P, Q, and Q as the heir of the deceased's child, N, P, and Q as the heir of the deceased's child, and his/her child, S, T, E's child as the heir of the deceased's children, the deceased's child, the deceased's child, E, the network, F's inheritance agreement, the network, F's inheritance delegation from the deceased's heir, the deceased's trust and the deceased's heir delegated by H from the deceased's heir, the deceased's heir and the deceased's heir delegated by the deceased's deceased, the deceased's heir and the deceased's heir.

3. In conclusion, the first instance judgment is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow