Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 08:35 on June 23, 2015, the Defendant: (b) was inside Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Dong-gu; (c) was in front of the latter part of the back of the elementary school; (d) the Defendant, a resident of the apartment building, such as the Defendant, who did not have a usual appraisal, performed an “nickter guard” in the above school; and (e) the Defendant’s “nickter and the staff of the management office,” and (e) the victim’s “nickter,”

Chewing year, gals of the same year, lifelongly, or sea drinking;

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by “a large sound,” etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to C by the police in the protocol; and

1. Each statement of witness in D, E, and F (the 34 through 36 pages, Nos. 3, 4, 5 pages, of the investigation record);

1. Descriptions and images of a investigative report (to verifyCCTV images and attach them to records);

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entries in one recording book;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant guilty of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order and the defendant did not take a bath against the victim

The charges are denied by asserting that they are facts charged.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the ruling, i.e., the victim, as stated in the facts charged at the time, expressed the victim’s desire to do so.

2. D, E, and F, a witness of the situation at the time, expressed the victim’s desire to do so (No. 3 of the investigation record No. 8 of the investigation record)

According to the statement (No. 2, No. 34, 35, 35, 4, 5) and CCTV video (No. 26:18, 27 of the investigation record), even if the defendant clearly confirms that he/she assaults the victim, he/she denies the fact that he/she assaults the victim, and therefore, he/she has credibility in the defendant's statement.

In full view of the fact that it is difficult to see, each evidence of the ruling.