1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. With respect to cases where this Court applies for the suspension of compulsory execution No. 2017 Chicago1008, 2017.

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Defendant attached C’s corporeal movables on November 18, 2015, based on the original copy of the instant judgment against C.

However, on September 14, 2015, the instant corporeal movables were leased by a notary public from C to pay the rent of KRW 370,000 per month from the 2948 No. 2948, supra.

Therefore, since the corporeal movables of this case are owned by the plaintiff, compulsory execution should not be permitted.

2. Even based on the plaintiff's assertion itself, the plaintiff merely leased the corporeal movables in this case to C and did not acquire ownership. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim in this case cannot be accepted.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed for reasons.