1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant Construction Co., Ltd. 1,555.

Basic Facts

The reasoning for this part is as follows: “Expert C and D” in Section 14 of Section 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance is “Expert C and D (hereinafter “Expert C and D”)”; “915,80,557” in the total section for common use in the table of Section 7 upper part of the judgment of the court of first instance is “915,80,559”; and “this court” in Section 8 is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance except where “this court” is used in the part of Section 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance to “court of first instance”; thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

With respect to the assertion that the rate of 15% profit shall apply to the appraisal result of appraiser D’s appraisal on whether there exists a defect and the scope of recognition, this part of the reasoning is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, this part of the reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

The reasoning for this part of the judgment on individual defects is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases of cutting down or adding to the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In Part 9, the "this Court" in Part 12 shall be applied to the "Court of First Instance".

The results of Part 9 are as follows: “The results of the fact-finding inquiry conducted on July 9, 2018 by the court of the first instance on the appraiser D of the case.”

The summary of the claim for item is determined [public 78] 2-79. 2-79. The construction of the replacement of fossils (public 91] 2-95. 2-95. 2-95. The construction of the defendant's completion of construction did not contain an incidental water to prevent corrosion in the Raston even though the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction of the construction

In the present state, it is not possible to capture the source water on the back side of the Raston, so the expenses for removing the whole water and replacing it with strong corrosion rock (including the expenses for the installation of a rain and a dust network) shall be calculated as the cost of repairing the defects.

The surface brym, etc. occurs.