logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.05.30 2014고단105
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of construction with its head office located in E in Seosan-si, and is a business owner who performs construction works of the E University Seo-gu 10 engineering hall construction works (the underground first floor, the class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class and the class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class class

Defendant

B is an employee of the corporation C, who is responsible for safety and health management for both the employees of the corporation C and the employees of the corporation subcontracted by C, who work in the above field.

Defendant

A is an employee of G Co., Ltd., and a person responsible for safety and health management for employees of G Co., Ltd. working at the site of reinforced concrete construction works.

1. A business owner violating the Occupational Safety and Health Act shall, when he/she carries out the work to dismantle or alter a vision of not less than 5 meters wide, take measures to prevent the fall by installing a light plate of not less than 20 centimeters wide and allowing workers to use a safety belt, etc., and the business owner, when his/her workers employed by the contractor carry out a part of the business carried out in the same place are engaged in the work at a place where the danger of fall is likely to fall, take safety measures to prevent the workers from falling.

Nevertheless, at around July 26, 2013, the Defendants did not take a step to prevent the fall by installing a light board at least 20cm in width and letting workers wear a safety belt and bet on the installation of the installation, etc. in the event of dismantling the external vision at the construction site of the said research Dong-dong on the same day, and the Defendants did not take a step to remove the external vision from the 6th (2.4m high) floor of the said research Dong-dong on the same day.

arrow