A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 12 shall be forfeited from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The case: The judgment of fraud, etc. rendered on May 30, 2017 by the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch of the Daegu District Court: Imprisonment with prison labor for six months: the termination of the execution of the sentence of the Incheon Juvenile Prison on July 8, 2017 [criminal facts]

1. The Defendant, at around 14:36 March 23, 2018, is the Vice-Chairperson of the head office D, by phoneing the victim C, who is an employee of the branch office B, in the Changwon Station located in 67 (Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong) as the window of Changwon-si, Seoul around 14:36.

The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport is the F professor of the department of E major Industry, and after attending the G General Forum, the taxi moves to the taxi, and the Busan City Ga has no travel expenses, which will make a full payment of KRW 300,000,000,000,000 won.

“A false statement” was made.

그러나 사실, 피고인은 주식회사 B 부회장 D이 아니고 D을 사칭하여 피해 자로부터 돈을 가로챌 생각이었다.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 300,00 from the injured party on the same day as the borrowed money.

2. The Defendant who attempted to commit fraud, at around 11:50 on July 19, 2018, called “the head office J division” to the victim I, who was employed by the branch office staff of H Changwon, Co., Ltd. in front of the said branch office.

The seminars have been given to the G University to the professor K of the Department of E University and University Industry, and it is in the shape of giving money in the taxi.

A false statement was made that “The cash amount of KRW 500,000,000 in the original page to pay money to the account through the book room to the wife.”

그러나 사실, 피고인은 주식회사 H 부회장 J이 아니고 J을 사칭하여 피해 자로부터 돈을 가로챌 생각이었다.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, intended to receive KRW 500,000 from the victim under the pretext of borrowing money, but was not arrested by the police upon reporting by the victim, and did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to I;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;