All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that all of the facts charged against the Defendants is guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning is justifiable.

There is no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or of misapprehending the legal principles on the scope of a certified judicial scrivener’s duties and punishment of excessive acts.

2. The assertion that there was an error in the misapprehension of the legal principles and deliberation on additional collection in the lower judgment is not a legitimate ground for appeal, which is alleged by the Defendants only in the final appeal that the lower court did not consider it as being subject to ex officio.

3. The argument that the lower court’s judgment erred in the misapprehension of legal principles and deliberation of legal errors is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as it asserted in the final appeal that Defendant A used it as the ground for appeal or was not subject to a judgment ex officio by the lower court.

4. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.