A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of two months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 13, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 18, 2012.

1. On January 16, 2012, the Defendant, at the Gangnam-gu Seoul office, borrowed money due to no particular property or income, there is no ability to repay, even if he/she did not intend to do so, and even if he/she received money under the pretext of investment, he/she shall make a false statement to the victim D, stating, “If he/she has a good investment place, he/she shall pay 6-7.2% of the principal interest every month, and shall repay the principal within 3 months,” and he/she shall receive 5 million won on the same day from the victim under the pretext of the borrowed money and receive 1950,000 won on January 29, 2012 from the victim to the national bank account (E) in the name of the Defendant;

2. On February 4, 2012, the Defendant, at the C office listed in the preceding paragraph, borrowed the money as described in the preceding paragraph, but did not have the ability to repay the money, the Defendant makes a false statement to the victim stating that “I will lend the money that will be used only in the mold,” and that is, in that context, obtain from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant stated in the preceding paragraph, one million won from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant stated in the preceding paragraph

3. On February 4, 2012, the Defendant, at the C office as described in the foregoing Paragraph (1) above, borrowed money as stated in the said Paragraph (1), but did not have the ability to repay, he/she falsely states, “If he/she lends a credit card as required to purchase a heavy vehicle, he/she shall use it and complete payment by the credit card settlement date,” and he/she received a credit card from the victim to pay 3.2 million won as the purchase price for a heavy vehicle on the same day and paid 2.4 million won on February 6, 2012 as the purchase price for the same day, and acquired the financial profit equivalent to the above aggregate amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Detailed inquiry into the results of transfers, sales slips 1.