The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the prosecutor's appeal is that the defendant in this case is deemed to have taken the body of the victim from the library stairs and recognized the gravity of the crime and of poor quality of the crime, and the defendant has been punished twice due to similar criminal records and has been sentenced to punishment. In light of the above, the court below's sentence that sentenced the order to attend the community service order for 8 months, 2 years of suspended execution, probation, 120 hours of community service order and 40 hours of sexual assault treatment is too uneasible.

2. In light of the facts alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering all the circumstances alleged in the grounds of appeal, given the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is against his parent; (b) the motive and background leading up to the instant crime; (c) the circumstances before and after the instant crime was committed; (d) the degree of damage; and (e) other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s character

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.