logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.01.11 2018고단4034
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 30, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court, and completed the execution of imprisonment on March 16, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

I. On August 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 20:30 on August 8, 2018, 2018, the Defendant: (b) had the victim C with the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Yangcheon-gu “D”; (c) had the victim believe that he would normally pay the amount of food, despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the amount of food; (d) had the victim believe that he would normally pay the amount of food; and (e) acquired it by means of having the victim receive a total of KRW 57,000 food of 57,00,000, such as three persons, air brea, and beer 1 disease.

Ⅱ From August 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 11:30 on August 7, 2018, the Defendant: (b) obtained a total of 81,000 won in the market price from the victim as if he/she would not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she did not sell food; and (c) acquired a total of 21,000 won in the market price by ordering food as if he/she would not pay the price.

Ⅲ around August 7, 2018, the Defendant issued an order to 'J' restaurant operated by the victim I on the H 1st floor in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on August 7, 2018, which would be able to pay the food cost even though there is no cash, credit card, etc., to the victim as if he would be able to pay the food cost, and then the Defendant received the f6,000 won of the market price from the victim, and acquired the f6,000 won of the market price.

IV. The Defendant of the 2018 Highest 5793, Aug. 5, 2018, in the “M” operated by the victim L in Michuhol-gu Incheon, Michuhol-gu, Incheon, on August 5, 2018, and even if there is no money in water and orders for food, the Defendant would be deemed to have paid a proper food value despite having no intention or ability to pay the price.

arrow